So I brought up the topic of literary role models the other day with a friend of mine. She works in the t.v. and film industry and is always asking me what book I'm currently reading, so I thought it would be interesting to get her opinion on the topic. 

I began with a tiny tirade about the Diary of a Wimpy Kids books and then went into asking whether or not we hold different expectations for our daughters then we do our sons. And I found myself in the course of the conversation wondering if I should really allow my son to read books that I dislike so much. I mean, is the fact that he's reading enough to out-weigh my clear dislike of the message these books? Isn't that the problem we face as parents? We want our children to read, so we tell ourselves, "Well, he's reading and that's the important thing." 

Anyway, as I was churning these thoughts over in my brain, my friend threw out a word that I hadn't even considered while thinking about all of this. Censorship. She mentioned it on a sort of bigger world scale (libraries and book stores) but it struck me that censorship exists on a parental level too. After all we as parents choose the rate at which we expose our kids to lots of things (e.g. youtube videos or rated-R movies).

So, how do we deal with that?

I want my kids to feel like the world is open to them. I want them to understand that seeking information is good. I want them to be worldly....and well read. So how do we deal with bad role models vs. censorship? It seems to me there is a fine line to walk in there and discussions to be had. 

I'll have to think on it some more.

What do you think?
Val
1/21/2012 02:29:14 am

Parental censorship is just good parenting. When you do not filter what your children experience, you open them up to the possibility of watching porn as a 3 year old. That is not something that anyone would see as a good thing! In fact, I struggle with seeing parental censorship as anything other than Parenting (with a capital P). While I have to respectfully disagree with your opinion about Diary of a Wimpy Kid (which I personally love and highly recommend to my age-appropriate students and kids) I do believe that there are bad options out there that masquerade as child-appropriate. For example, Twilight for the under 14 crowd. I do not think that it is appropriate or good parenting for children younger than high school age to read those kids of books (or see the movies) that glorify relationships, sex, and sexual experiences. For a TV example that is marketed to children, the bane of my existence is SpongeBob SqarePants.
Don't get me wrong...I love SpongeBob. But that is as an adult watching the show. SpongeBob teaches countless children how to cuss and get away with it ("tartar sauce," "fish paste," and "barnacles" just to name a few). [From my soap box...what is the difference between saying "shit" and "tartar sauce" after you do something incorrectly?] The show also has a lot of innuendo, inappropriate jokes, and adult moments. Remarkable for a child's TV show.
Do I let my own kids watch SpongeBob? Yes. Do I discuss SpongeBob with my students? Yes. But I also actively work with each of these groups of kids to counteract the effects of the show? Definitely. I do so by using SpongeBob references in unexpected ways. For example, when my students and I were learning about surface tension with bubbles, we tried to figure out how SpongeBob blows all his crazy bubbles! In fact, we tried his method of blowing them, from the episode where he set up a bubble blowing stand. Then the lesson became about real vs. fantasy and how cartoon characters can do things that people cannot.
Censorship is an important part of parenting. Without creating a barrier between adult and child, you open the WHOLE adult world to children. But I will say this about censorship; it should be practiced by the PARENT not the SOCIETY. It is not society's responsibility to say that X book is not acceptable for children; it is the parent's responsibility to be there for their children to create that buffer zone. Unfortunately this doesn't always happen, though. I know that I would have been more unhappy if my parents would have limited what I read because of the societally suggested age of a book. I was reading at a high school level before middle school, so age-appropriate books were WAY beneath my comprehension level. If I would have been mired in those texts, who knows what could have happened to my love of reading! Because I had great parents, though, I was able to read and explore a world that I didn't always understand but was always able to discuss and learn about with them.
It is the role of the parent to create a safety zone for their children, and that extends out from physical safety to the protection of the innocence of their children's psyche. Censorship is for the masses, if the masses are children.
-V

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.